In one more case of the shareholders attempting to run the asylum, the Napster shareholders/subscribers who launched a proxy fight to gain a seat on the board are arguing that Napster is undervalued, according to paidContent. Their rationale? If CBS was willing to pay $280 million for last.fm, then Napster should be valued at least the same, if not higher.”
Related: math
Funny math: Angry Napster shareholders point to last.fm, not balance sheet, to determine valuation by hackernews
“In one more case of the shareholders attempting to run the asylum, the Napster shareholders/subscribers who launched a proxy fight to gain a seat on the board are arguing that Napster is undervalued, according to paidContent. Their rationale? If CBS was willing to pay $280 million for last.fm, then Napster should be valued at least the same, if not higher.”
In one more case of the shareholders attempting to run the asylum, the Napster shareholders/subscribers who launched a proxy fight to gain a seat on the board are arguing that Napster is undervalued, according to paidContent. Their rationale? If CBS was willing to pay $280 million for last.fm, then Napster should be valued at least the same, if not higher.”
Loading...